CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BRAZILIAN PRELIMINARY RISK ANALYSES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISO 31000:2018 AND ISO/IEC 31010:2021: METHODOLOGICAL GAPS AND IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT

Hugo Pimentel Tavares; Vlader César Silva de Castro; Nilo Antônio de Souza Sampaio

Todos os Trabalhos

Trabalho Completo

Resumo

DOI

10.29327/9786527225416.1302927

Título do Trabalho

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BRAZILIAN PRELIMINARY RISK ANALYSES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISO 31000:2018 AND ISO/IEC 31010:2021: METHODOLOGICAL GAPS AND IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT

Autores

Hugo Pimentel Tavares
Vlader César Silva de Castro
Nilo Antônio de Souza Sampaio

Modalidade

Artigo Completo

Área temática

Gestão de Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

Data de Publicação

30/06/2026

País da Publicação

Brasil

Idioma da Publicação

pt-BR

Página do Trabalho

https://www.even3.com.br/anais/conest2025/1302927-critical-analysis-of-brazilian-preliminary-risk-analyses-from-the-perspective-of-iso-31000-2018-and-isoiec-3101

ISBN

978-65-272-2541-6

Palavras-Chave

PRELIMINARY RISK ANALYSIS; ISO 31000; RISK MANAGEMENT; REGULATORY STANDARDS; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY

Resumo

Preliminary Risk Analyses constitute a fundamental occupational safety and health management instrument required by various Brazilian Regulatory Standards, however their practical implementation presents significant methodological limitations when compared to international standards established by ISO 31000:2018 and ISO/IEC 31010:2021 techniques. This study conducts systematic critical analysis of traditional PRA methodologies used in Brazil, identifying structural gaps and improvement opportunities through integration with internationally recognized risk management principles. Through comparative document analysis of Brazilian regulatory framework and ISO standards, complemented by specialized bibliographic review, five main categories of limitations were identified: analytical superficiality, absence of systemic contextualization, inadequacy of assessment techniques, deficiencies in uncertainty treatment and insufficiency of monitoring mechanisms. The research proposes enhanced methodological framework that harmonizes national regulatory requirements with international best practices, maintaining operational viability while significantly elevating technical rigor of analyses. Results demonstrate that judicious integration of ISO 31000 and 31010 elements can transform PRAs from merely bureaucratic instruments into effective tools for proactive occupational risk management.

Título do Evento: 27º CONEST / 8º COIEST – Congresso Nacional e Internacional de Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho
Cidade do Evento: Brasília
Título dos Anais do Evento: Anais do CONEST e do COIEST: Congresso Nacional e Internacional de Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho
Nome da Editora: Even3
Meio de Divulgação: Meio Digital
DOI

Como citar

TAVARES, Hugo Pimentel; CASTRO, Vlader César Silva de; SAMPAIO, Nilo Antônio de Souza. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BRAZILIAN PRELIMINARY RISK ANALYSES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISO 31000:2018 AND ISO/IEC 31010:2021: METHODOLOGICAL GAPS AND IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT.. In: Anais do CONEST e do COIEST: Congresso Nacional e Internacional de Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho. Anais...Brasília(DF) CLDF, 2025. Disponível em: https//www.even3.com.br/anais/conest2025/1302927-CRITICAL-ANALYSIS-OF-BRAZILIAN-PRELIMINARY-RISK-ANALYSES-FROM-THE-PERSPECTIVE-OF-ISO-31000-2018-AND-ISOIEC-3101. Acesso em: 12/07/2026